Engineers · Engineering Firms
Find any technical document, search your past projects using natural language, and speed up your responses to requests for proposals—all without migrating your servers.
Verified rights
What slab thickness was selected for Hall B?
14 results · 3 sources
NDC_Slab_HalleB_v3.pdf
“… slab thickness increased to 22 cm following the inspection agency’s recommendation …”
CCTP_Lot2_GO_HalleB.docx
“… 22-cm-thick C30/37 concrete slab, HA reinforcement as shown on the drawings …”
RE: Assumptions for the Halle B Slab
“… the client has approved the 22-cm version; please update the technical specifications …”
Outmind Assistant
3 sources
Regarding the Halle B project, the slab thickness was increased from 20 to 22 cm following the inspection agency’s recommendation (calculation note v3, 2019). The technical specifications for Lot 2 specify 22 cm of C30/37 concrete, and the client approved this change via email on March 14, 2019.
SharePointCCTP_Lot2_GO_HalleB.docx
OutlookRE: Assumptions for the Halle B Slab, 2019Response based on the research findings
9 results · 3 sources
NDC_Structure_Parking_Lyon_2021.pdf
“… operating loads of 2.5 kN/m², light vehicles …”
Soil_Report_G2_Parking_Nantes.pdf
“… load-bearing assumptions adopted for the foundation slab …”
RE: BC Parking Structure Opinion
“… favorable opinion on the charges brought …”
DCE · Aquatic Center
12 items analyzed
Does the EXE Plan, Index B, comply with the Technical Specifications for Lot 2?
Outmind Assistant
Discrepancy detectedEXE Plan B specifies a 20-cm slab. The technical specifications for Lot 2 [1] and the project owner’s approval email [2] specify 22 cm, as confirmed by the inspection agency’s report [3].
[1] CCTP_Lot2_GO.docx[2] RE: Slab Variant[3] Opinion_BC_2019.pdfAcceptance Report · Hall B
18 reservations
How can I help you?
Ten-Year Warranty · Expert Assessments · Claims
A claim under the ten-year warranty, a court-ordered expert assessment, a business claim: you need to find the email in which the project owner approved the design variation, the minutes documenting the decision, and the inspection agency’s opinion. Often stored on an old server, sometimes in a PST archive, and written by people who have left the company.
At Iming, during a court-ordered expert review, a staff member retrieved information from the document database during the hearing to counter an argument raised by the opposing party.
Who approved the change to the roof waterproofing in Hall B?
2016
Email from the project owner approving the alternative
2017
Construction Site Report No. 23 Recording the Decision
2017
Approval from the audit office
2024
Claim Report Received