Modern LLMs are remarkable for their ability to provide tailored answers in seconds, where humans could spend hours. However, they can sometimes present biases or produce factually incorrect answers, often due to gaps in their training corpus. These gaps can be attributed to the novelty, scarcity or confidentiality of the data available.
For critical applications, such as interpreting legal clauses or validating sensitive information, the ability to generate accurate answers from verified sources becomes essential. This is where RAG systems come into their own, fitting in perfectly with "knowledge-intensive applications". These systems combine the power of LLMs with controlled knowledge bases, while guaranteeing the transparency of the sources used.
A RAG system is defined by its ability to enrich language models via a targeted search of a defined corpus. It is based on a modular architecture that exploits a set of advanced techniques to transform raw data into contextualized, accurate responses.
Let's start by naming and defining the components of a RAG architecture. We have deliberately limited the concepts used here to four main ones:
To process natural language, texts need to be converted into numerical representations called embeddings. These vectors preserve the semantic proximity between similar concepts. Pre-trained models, such as those derived from BERT, offer a proven solution for this transformation. These embeddings form the basis for subsequent semantic searches.
To maximize search efficiency, the corpus is fragmented into small segments called chunks. Each chunk is enriched with essential metadata (source, context, date, etc.) before being converted into embeddings. This structuring improves data retrieval and guarantees full traceability of the information used.
Information identification is based on vector databases, which identify the most relevant chunks for a given question. By exploiting proximity in vector space, these databases offer optimum efficiency, even with large volumes of data. Solutions such as ChromaDB, Qdrant or PGVector are regularly used for these operations. For greater efficiency, we recommend combining text and vector approaches (hybrid model) to enhance the relevance of responses.
The extracted chunks are combined with the question asked to form a prompt. The LLM then generates a synthetic, contextualized response. This approach lightens the cognitive load of the model, enabling more relevant responses.
Based on these components, the architecture of a RAG system follows a well-defined sequence:
Recent research has demonstrated the effectiveness of RAG:
Despite its advantages, RAG has certain limitations:
RAG systems are state-of-the-art solutions for environments requiring precision and reliability. Their integration with intelligent agents enhances their capabilities by adding additional functions, such as online search or the use of specialized APIs.
However, to guarantee their long-term effectiveness, it is crucial to evaluate their performance on an ongoing basis. Evaluation metrics should focus on the relevance of responses, security, and the traceability of information embedded in the responses provided.
In conclusion: by combining the rigor of controlled knowledge bases with the flexibility of language models, RAG architectures open up new perspectives for robust, high value-added applications. Now it's your turn!